Find Your Next Legal Career Resource

Browse through over a thousand legal jobs, quick gigs, scholarships, events, and many more in Nigeria's only and largest legal opportunity platform.

Opportunities viewed 0 times
Total users 0

Featured Jobs

View All
N

Lawyer

Nine stars Agricultural Limited

Key ResponsibilitiesDraft, review, and negotiate contracts, agreements, and other legal documents.Provide legal support on real estate transactions including land acquisition, leases, property documentation, and title verification.Handle legal matters relating to agricultural operations, including land use agreements, regulatory compliance, and vendor contracts.Ensure compliance with local, state, and federal laws and regulations.Conduct legal research and provide sound legal advice to management.Liaise with external counsel, government agencies, and regulatory bodies when required.Manage dispute resolution, litigation processes, and legal risk mitigation.Maintain proper documentation and legal records of company transactions.Advise management on legal risks and corporate governance matters.How to ApplyClick the Email Apply button to send your application. Interested and qualified candidates should send their CV using the job title as the subject of the mail.If you need guidance preparing your CV, create an ATS-compliant CV here.Prepare for common recruitment tests such as the Watson Glaser by practicing freely on our platform here.After applying, track your application progress and send follow-up emails directly from your Thrive dashboard here.The Thrive Team wishes you the very best. 

Ogun
Full Time
O

Legal Attorney I

Oando Plc

Job SummaryThe Legal Attorney I works within the Legal Services department, reporting to the Division Manager, Corporate Legal Services, to provide day-to-day legal services support and advice to Oando and its local & international subsidiaries on various legal transactions and corporate projects/assignments.The Legal Attorney I shall also provide day-to-day legal support to the various units within Oando in a bid to achieve effective and efficient management of the legal needs of each transaction/assignment handled. This will include, without limitation, the preparation and drafting and/or review of contracts, legal opinions, dispute resolution management, etc.In addition, the Legal Attorney I provides project administration support and handles time and fee schedules, project work plan monitoring, status report preparation, project documentation, and filing in addition to handling assigned responsibilities.

Lagos
Full Time
Polaris Solicitors logo

Accountant (Post-NYSC) – Career Growth Opportunity

Polaris Solicitors

About Polaris Solicitors:Polaris Solicitors is a reputable law firm providing professional legal services across multiple practice areas. We are expanding our team and seeking a responsible Accountant to support our financial operations.Role Overview:You will be responsible for managing financial records, ensuring compliance, and supporting financial planning within the firm. 

Abuja
Full Time
M

Senior Legal Counsel, Operations.

Moniepoint Group

 Job PurposeYou are the commercial architect behind Moniepoint’s most strategic deals. As our Senior Legal Counsel for Contracts, you ensure we move fast and innovate without compromising on security or compliance.This role isn't just about "spotting risks"—it’s about finding creative, factual, and simple ways to help the business achieve its goals. You will lead our approach to complex technology agreements, corporate finance, and M&A, ensuring that every contract we sign reflects our mastery and protects our mission to create financial happiness.Key ResponsibilitiesLead the Deal: Drive the drafting, negotiation, and execution of complex commercial agreements, from SaaS and licensing to payment partnerships.Master the Details: Provide clear, jargon-free legal guidance on contractual risk and liability. You explain the "why" behind the “what.”Build for Scale: Create and maintain contract templates and playbooks that make our legal processes efficient and consistent across the globe.Protect our IP: Advise on intellectual property, licensing structures, and data protection to ensure Moniepoint’s innovations stay ours.Drive Growth: Lead legal support for corporate finance, including debt and equity financing, and manage the legal lifecycle of M&A and investment deals.Partner with Experts: Collaborate with finance, strategy, and external advisors to ensure our transactions are executed with precision. Operational Excellence: Monitor our contractual health, ensuring we meet our obligations and stay ahead of regulatory shifts.  

Lagos
Full Time
N

Law intern

Nubianette

Are you a law graduate with a flair for marketing? Or a research whiz looking to break into the legal industry? Nubianette is looking for YOU! We are opening applications for our 3 -6 Month Paid Internship Program. Get ready to build your portfolio in a role that blends legal intelligence with high-level digital strategy.Location: Remote (Lagos)Type: Paid InternshipTools Needed: Functional Laptop & SmartphoneWhat you'll be doing:- Legal Market Intelligence & Research.- Social Media Management & Copywriting.- Supporting Client Communications.- Project Ownership & Strategy

Remote
Internship
S

NYSC Trainee Associate

Shield & Buckler Associates

 Shield & Buckler AssociatesBarristers | Solicitors | ArbitratorsNYSC TRAINEE ASSOCIATECRITERIA:Candidate must be called to the Nigerian Bar Association;Candidate must be serving in Lagos;Candidate must demonstrate understanding of basic principles of LawCandidate must demonstrate excellent communication and interpersonal skill    

Hybrid
Full Time
R

NYSC Associate

Redswitch Collections

Job DescriptionsOur client is seeking a Law graduate currently serving under the NYSC scheme and yet to attend Nigerian Law School to support its legal and compliance functions.Assist in drafting and reviewing basic legal documents and correspondence.Support regulatory compliance and documentation processes.Conduct legal research and prepare summaries.Maintain legal records, filings, and correspondence.Provide administrative support to the legal unit.

Abuja
Internship
M

Legal Intern

Mark Renee LP

Gain hands-on experience at a reputable Nigerian law firm as a Legal Intern. This role is designed for ambitious undergraduate law students looking to bridge the gap between academic theory and practical legal work. You will support the legal team, assist in research, and gain valuable insight into the daily operations of a law firm.Responsibilities:Conduct Legal Research: Assist associates in analysing case law, statutes, and regulations using resources like LawPavilion and library materials to support case preparation.Draft Basic Documents: Prepare first drafts of legal memos, client letters, and case summaries under the supervision of senior lawyers.Administrative Support: Assist in organizing case files, proofreading documents, and managing data entry to ensure efficient firm operations.Monitor Legal Trends: Help track relevant updates in Nigerian legislation and news to keep the team informed.Observe & Learn: Shadow lawyers during client meetings or court sessions (where permitted) to understand advocacy and client management.Collaborate with Team: Work closely with NYSC associates and senior lawyers to ensure tasks are completed accurately and on time.

Remote
Internship
H

Corporate Lawyer and Company Secretary

Harmony Garden and Estate Development Limited

Job DescriptionsWorking with the CEO and members of the management team to ensure all company compliance and regulatory obligations are fully met.Responsible for drafting, reviewing contracts and relative documents for service operation of new and ongoing business transactions.Working with external lawyers to prepare and review legal documents such as service agreements, deeds, and memoranda of understanding.Responsible for the legal affairs mamangement of the company and providing legal consultant services.Advising on business transactions, claims liability, advisabilityof prosecution or defending lawsuits (by relating with external counsels) or legal rights obligations.

Lagos
Full Time
L

Junior Associate

Lekan Bamidele & Co

Role Snapshot• Legal research & case summaries• Draft & review basic contracts & pleadings• Assist with due diligence & filings• Support senior lawyers on matters

Lagos
Full Time
J

IP Associate

Jackson Etti & Edu

Jackson Etti & Edu is hiring an IP Associate.Shortlist Criteria:·    Minimum of Second Class Upper at both University and Law School·    Must have completed NYSC·    1–2 years PQE  

Hybrid
Full Time
I

NYSC Graduate Interns

International Facilities Services (IFS) Group

International Facilities Services (IFS) is an International Facilities Management company operating in global standards to a wide range of clients in Nigeria, Ghana, South Africa and the Middle East.How to ApplyClick the Email Apply button to send your application. Interested and qualified candidates should send their CV using using "NYSC Graduate Internship - indicate your specialty (as applicable to you)" as the subject of the email. For example: e.g.: NYSC Graduate Internship - Computer Science.If you need guidance preparing your CV, create an ATS-compliant CV here.Prepare for common recruitment tests such as the Watson Glaser by practicing freely on our platform here.After applying, track your application progress and send follow-up emails directly from your Thrive dashboard here.The Thrive Team wishes you the very best.

Lagos
Internship
See More Jobs

Discover Our Premium Features

Explore our comprehensive suite of tools designed to accelerate your legal career

Place your ads here

Advertisement space — your content will appear when loaded

Advertise with us

Featured Scholarships

View All

Beijing Normal University Scholarship

Ph.D
The Beijing Normal University Scholarship only supports graduate students. It covers both major study and Chinese langua...
Beijing China Deadline: Mar 15, 2026
View Details
Active

The Ban Ki-moon Scholarship 2026

Masters
Are you passionate about the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and eager to make a lasting global impa...
Austria Deadline: Mar 31, 2026
View Details
Active

UK Leverhulme Doctoral Scholarships 2026

Research
The UK Leverhulme Doctoral Scholarships 2026 are fully funded research awards offered through the Leverhulme Trust’s C...
United Kingdom Deadline: Mar 06, 2026
View Details
Active

Mauritius Government Scholarship

Masters
Applications for the Scholarships are to be made to the Nominating Agency in the applicant’s country of origin and are...
Mauritius Deadline: Mar 27, 2026
View Details
Active
See More Scholarships

Latest Career Insights

View All
Cheat Codes to Passing Watson Glaser Tests for Law firms (Please keep this secret)
Latest

Cheat Codes to Passing Watson Glaser Tests for Law firms (Please keep this secret)

In the high-stakes world of legal recruitment, where top-tier firms sift through thousands of ambitious applicants, one test stands between you and the job of your dreams: the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. It's not a memory drill on torts or a speed-read of contracts, it's a razor-sharp probe into your ability to dissect arguments, spot hidden flaws, and draw conclusions that hold up under fire. Picture this: You're advising a client on a multimillion-pound merger, sifting through red flags in due diligence, or cross-examining a witness whose story doesn't add up. That's the real-world muscle the Watson Glaser builds, and tests.Why does it matter so much? Top firms may use it to spot thinkers who won't crumble under pressure, who can navigate ambiguity like a seasoned barrister in court. With pass rates hovering around 70% for top scorers, it's the gatekeeper that separates the pack from the partners-to-be. But here's the good news: It's learnable. This guide, crafted for law students and juniors eyeing vacation schemes, breaks it down batch by batch, no fluff, just battle-tested strategies. We'll start with the essentials, then dive into each of the five categories: Inference, Recognition of Assumptions, Deduction, Interpretation, and Evaluation of Arguments. By the end, you'll not only ace the test but think like the lawyer firms crave, one who turns facts into wins.Ready to sharpen your edge? Let's roll. 1. Inference: Assessing the Degree of Certainty in ConclusionsThe Inference section of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal requires candidates to determine the extent to which a conclusion follows from a provided statement or passage. This skill is fundamental to critical analysis, as it trains the mind to evaluate evidence with precision, distinguishing between what is definitively supported, highly probable, indeterminate, unlikely, or outright contradicted. In professional contexts, such as legal reasoning, this mirrors the evaluation of evidentiary inferences in case preparation, where one must ascertain whether a chain of facts reasonably supports a claim without overextension.To excel, adhere to these core principles:True: The conclusion follows beyond reasonable doubt, with no plausible alternative interpretation.Probably True: The conclusion is more likely than not, supported by the preponderance of evidence (typically 70% or greater likelihood based on the text).Insufficient Data: The information provided neither confirms nor refutes the conclusion; additional facts are required.Probably False: The conclusion is less likely than not, as the evidence leans against it without absolute disproof.False: The conclusion directly contradicts the given information.A critical guideline is to base judgments solely on the passage, supplemented only by general knowledge where it does not introduce speculation. Avoid injecting domain-specific assumptions; instead, methodically map the inference to the facts. This discipline prevents common errors, such as conflating correlation with causation or presuming completeness in incomplete data sets.Example Question :Statement: Two hundred school students in their early teens voluntarily attended a recent weekend student conference in Leeds. At this conference, the topics of race relations and means of achieving lasting world peace were discussed, since these were problems that the students selected as being most vital in today's world.Inference: As a group, the students who attended this conference showed a keener interest in broad social problems than do most other people in their early teens.Rating Options: True, Probably True, Insufficient Data, Probably False, False.Step-by-Step Solution:Identify the key elements of the statement: The students (early teens) voluntarily attended a conference focused on significant social issues (race relations and world peace), which they themselves deemed vital.Evaluate the inference against the facts: The voluntary participation and self-selection of topics indicate a heightened engagement with these issues, which are not typical weekend activities for most adolescents. General knowledge supports that such proactive involvement in substantive discussions is uncommon among this age group, who often prioritize leisure over societal concerns.Assess the degree of certainty: While the statement strongly implies greater interest, it does not provide comparative data on "most other people" or rule out alternative motivations (e.g., social networking). Thus, the conclusion is highly probable but not definitive. Correct Answer: Probably True.Detailed Explanation of a Real Examination-Style Question:Consider another authentic example from the same official practice materials, which closely replicates the inference challenges encountered in recruitment assessments for legal roles.Statement: Studies have shown that there is relatively much more heart disease among people living in the north of England than people living in the south of England. There is little if any difference, however, in rate of heart disease between northerners and southerners who have the same level of income. The average income of southerners in England is considerably higher than the average income of northerners.Inference: People in high income brackets are in a better position to avoid developing heart disease than people in low income brackets.Rating Options: True, Probably True, Insufficient Data, Probably False, False.Step-by-Step Solution:Dissect the statement: Regional disparity exists (higher rates in the north), but it vanishes when income is equalized across regions. Southerners, on average, enjoy higher incomes.Link to the inference: The overall lower rates in the south correlate with higher average incomes, suggesting that income level influences heart disease risk. When incomes match, rates match—implying lower-income groups (prevalent in the north) face elevated risks relative to higher-income groups.Determine the likelihood: This follows with strong probabilistic support from the income-rate equalization, but the statement does not explicitly attribute causation (e.g., lifestyle factors tied to income). General knowledge of socioeconomic health gradients reinforces the probability without guaranteeing it. No direct contradiction exists, yet full proof would require isolating income as the sole variable. Correct Answer: Probably True.Explanation: This question tests the ability to infer socioeconomic implications from aggregate data, a skill directly applicable to analyzing statistical evidence in public law or regulatory compliance matters. The "probably" rating avoids overreach: while the evidence points convincingly toward income as a protective factor, the passage leaves room for unmentioned confounders, such as diet or access to healthcare. In a timed test environment, candidates often err by selecting "True" due to intuitive appeal, but precision demands acknowledging evidential limits. Practicing such items hones the judgment needed for evaluating probabilistic claims in affidavits or expert reports, where overconfident inferences can undermine a case.To reinforce mastery, review similar questions from our test platform, focusing on why "Insufficient Data" applies to unsupported extrapolations. This section typically comprises 5-10 questions in the full appraisal; allocate no more than 1-2 minutes per item to maintain pacing.With Inference under your belt, proceed to the next category: Recognition of Assumptions, where we uncover the unspoken foundations of arguments.2. Recognition of Assumptions: Identifying Unstated Beliefs in a StatementThe Recognition of Assumptions section evaluates the capacity to detect implicit premises or presuppositions that underpin a statement, even if not explicitly articulated. This skill is essential for rigorous analysis, as it reveals the foundational beliefs upon which arguments rest, often exposing vulnerabilities in reasoning. In professional settings, such as legal argumentation or policy evaluation, recognizing assumptions prevents the acceptance of flawed propositions—much like identifying unproven elements in a contractual clause or statutory interpretation that could invalidate an entire case.Key principles to internalize include:Assumption Made: The proposed assumption is necessary for the statement's logic to hold; without it, the statement loses coherence or persuasive force. It must be directly relevant and not merely tangential.Assumption Not Made: The statement stands independently, or the proposed idea is extraneous, overly specific, or not required to bridge any logical gaps.A pivotal technique is the "Negative Test": Rephrase the proposed assumption in negative form (e.g., "It is not the case that...") and insert it into the statement. If the statement remains valid, the assumption was not made; if it collapses, it was. Additionally, distinguish assumptions from implications (which follow from the statement) or generalizations (which extend beyond it). Limit reliance to the text and general plausibility, eschewing specialized knowledge. This section often proves challenging, comprising around 12 questions, so allocate 1-2 minutes per item, practicing to spot relevance swiftly.Example Question (Drawn from Official Practice Materials):Statement: It is unwise to take this route if you cannot swim.Proposed Assumption: There is a river along the route.Answer Options: Assumption Made, Assumption Not Made.Step-by-Step Solution:Examine the statement: The advice hinges on swimming ability as a risk factor for the route.Apply the Negative Test: Rephrase as "There is no river along the route." Inserting this negates the wisdom of the warning, rendering the statement illogical—why mention swimming otherwise?Assess relevance: The assumption directly explains the peril, forming an essential link without which the caution is baseless. Correct Answer: Assumption Made.This item, adapted from standard Watson-Glaser practice exercises, underscores the need for contextual necessity; alternative explanations (e.g., a wizard disliking non-swimmers) are implausible and thus dismissed.Detailed Explanation of a Real Examination-Style Question:Drawing from verified preparation resources, consider this authentic example, which mirrors the format and complexity of those in recruitment assessments.Statement: I am planning a trip to China. I don't speak any Chinese. However, I can download a translator app that will allow me to communicate effectively.Proposed Assumption: The translator app will enable me to overcome the language barrier during my trip.Answer Options: Assumption Made, Assumption Not Made.Step-by-Step Solution:Dissect the statement: The first sentence outlines the plan; the second identifies a problem (language gap); the third proposes a solution (app download).Probe for the gap: The transition from problem to solution implies the app addresses the issue directly; without assuming its efficacy, the "however" clause fails to resolve the concern logically.Evaluate using the Negative Test: Negate as "The translator app will not enable effective communication." This undermines the statement's optimism, making the solution seem inadequate and the overall narrative inconsistent. The assumption is thus integral, connecting the obstacle to its purported remedy under reasonable doubt. Correct Answer: Assumption Made.Explanation: This question, sourced from comprehensive Watson-Glaser preparation modules, tests the detection of solution-oriented presuppositions, a common pitfall where candidates overlook the implied efficacy. The "assumption made" designation arises because the statement's persuasive flow relies on the app's success; absent this, it devolves into mere listing without progression. In a test context, errors often stem from viewing the app mention as descriptive rather than assumptive, but the conditional structure ("however") demands linkage. This mirrors real-world analytical tasks, such as assessing reliance on unproven contingencies in business proposals or affidavits, where unchallenged assumptions can lead to costly oversights. For reinforcement, engage with similar items from our online test platformMastering this category sharpens discernment for hidden dependencies; proceed to the next: Deduction, where conclusions must follow inexorably from premises. 3. Deduction: Determining Logical Necessity from PremisesThe Deduction section of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal demands the evaluation of whether a proposed conclusion necessarily follows from a set of given premises, with no room for probability or external conjecture. This skill cultivates deductive rigor, akin to constructing airtight syllogisms in legal syllogistic reasoning—where statutes (premises) must inexorably lead to case outcomes (conclusions) without interpretive latitude. It distinguishes valid entailment from mere plausibility, ensuring arguments remain unassailable.Essential principles to commit to memory:Conclusion Follows (YES): The conclusion is logically compelled by the premises; it must be true if the premises are true, barring no exceptions or additional assumptions.Conclusion Does Not Follow (NO): The conclusion may be true in reality or seem intuitive, but it does not derive directly from the premises; counterexamples or gaps exist within the logical structure.Employ the "Validity Chain" method: Rephrase premises into categorical terms (e.g., "All A are B"), then apply the conclusion as a test proposition. If it emerges inescapably, it follows; if the premises permit alternatives, it does not. Confine analysis to the text, ignoring real-world validations—this section, with approximately 5-10 items, rewards swift pattern recognition, so target 1 minute per conclusion to sustain momentum.Example Question (Drawn from Official Practice Materials):Premises: Some holidays are rainy. All rainy days are boring.Proposed Conclusion: Some holidays are boring.Answer Options: Conclusion Follows (YES), Conclusion Does Not Follow (NO).Step-by-Step Solution:Formalize the premises: Premise 1 establishes a partial overlap (some holidays fall within the "rainy" category). Premise 2 categorically links "rainy" to "boring" (universal inclusion).Trace the entailment: The intersection of "some holidays" with "rainy" (from Premise 1) must inherit the "boring" attribute (from Premise 2), yielding "some holidays are boring" without contradiction or omission.Validate against alternatives: No premise allows for rainy holidays to evade boredom, nor does it restrict the overlap to zero instances. Correct Answer: Conclusion Follows (YES).This foundational example exemplifies the transitive property in deductive logic: partial sets propagate universal traits.Detailed Explanation of a Real Examination-Style Question:The following is an authentic multi-conclusion exercise from the official Pearson practice materials, reflecting the format's demand for discerning per-item validity amid interconnected premises.Premises: No responsible leader can avoid making difficult decisions. Some responsible leaders dislike making difficult decisions.Proposed Conclusions:9. Some difficult decisions are distasteful to some people.10. Irresponsible leaders avoid things they dislike.11. Some responsible leaders do things they dislike doing.Answer Options (per conclusion): Conclusion Follows (YES), Conclusion Does Not Follow (NO).Step-by-Step Solution:Formalize the premises: Premise 1 translates to "All responsible leaders make difficult decisions" (universal affirmative). Premise 2 introduces a subset ("Some responsible leaders dislike difficult decisions").Evaluate Conclusion 9: The subset from Premise 2 (dislike) directly attributes distaste to "difficult decisions" for those leaders (some people). This flows necessarily, as the premises link the decisions to the sentiment without qualifiers. Answer: YES.Evaluate Conclusion 10: The premises address only responsible leaders; no information pertains to irresponsible ones, their actions, or dislikes. This introduces an unbridged category, rendering it non-entailed. Answer: NO.Evaluate Conclusion 11: Combining Premise 1 (all responsible leaders make difficult decisions) with Premise 2 (some dislike them) compels that those "some" perform disliked actions. No escape clause exists in the premises. Answer: YES.Explanation: Sourced verbatim from the Pearson Watson-Glaser practice PDF, this question probes selective entailment, a frequent stumbling block where candidates extrapolate beyond defined scopes (e.g., to "irresponsible" leaders). The dual "YES" outcomes for 9 and 11 arise from the premises' tight syllogistic chain, while 10's "NO" highlights the peril of illicit major terms in logic. In assessment scenarios, overreach on extraneous conclusions often lowers scores, but methodical per-item dissection ensures accuracy. For deeper practice, consult the jobtest platform, analyzing why intuitive appeals (e.g., "leaders generally avoid dislikes") fail deductive muster.Proficiency in Deduction fortifies the logical spine of critical thinking; the next category, Interpretation, extends this to evidential weighing.3. Deduction: Determining if a Conclusion Must Logically Follow from PremisesThe Deduction section of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal assesses the ability to ascertain whether a proposed conclusion is logically compelled by a set of premises, without exception or qualification. This demands syllogistic reasoning: premises are treated as axiomatic truths, and conclusions must derive inescapably from them, akin to applying statutory provisions to undisputed facts in legal adjudication. Deviations based on external knowledge or intuition invalidate the process; the focus remains on structural necessity.Essential principles include:Conclusion Follows (YES): The conclusion is a direct, inevitable outcome of the premises, with no alternative possibilities within the given framework. It must apply universally to the defined scope (e.g., "some" implies at least one, potentially all).Conclusion Does Not Follow (NO): The premises permit scenarios where the conclusion is false, or it introduces elements beyond the premises (e.g., negation, causation, or unrelated classes).Employ the "Counterexample Test": Construct a plausible scenario consistent with the premises that falsifies the conclusion; if viable, mark NO. Quantifiers like "all," "some," and "no" carry precise logical weight—"some" denotes partial but non-zero inclusion. This section typically features 5-10 items, each with multiple conclusions; budget 1-2 minutes per exercise, diagramming sets (e.g., Venn) for complex relations to accelerate accuracy.Example Question (Drawn from Official Practice Materials):Statement (Premises):Some holidays are rainy.All rainy days are boring.Therefore:Proposed Conclusions:No clear days are boring.Some holidays are boring.Some holidays are not boring.Answer Options: For each conclusion, YES (Conclusion follows) or NO (Conclusion does not follow).Step-by-Step Solution:Parse the premises: Premise 1 establishes a partial overlap (some holidays ⊂ rainy days). Premise 2 asserts universality (rainy days → boring).For Conclusion 1: Test via counterexample—premises allow clear days (non-rainy) to be boring (no prohibition). Thus, it does not necessarily follow.For Conclusion 2: The overlap (some rainy holidays) combined with universality yields some boring holidays inescapably.For Conclusion 3: While possible (clear holidays exist implicitly), the premises do not compel it—rainy holidays could encompass all, making non-boring holidays unnecessary. Correct Answers: 1. NO; 2. YES; 3. NO.This foundational example, from the official Watson-Glaser practice appraisal (UK Edition), demonstrates quantifier interplay; mistaking possibility for necessity is a frequent error.Detailed Explanation of a Real Examination-Style Question:The following exercise, also from the official practice materials, exemplifies deductive chains involving negation and partial classes, common in assessments for analytical roles.Statement (Premises):No responsible leader can avoid making difficult decisions.Some responsible leaders dislike making difficult decisions.Therefore:Proposed Conclusions:9. Some difficult decisions are distasteful to some people.10. Irresponsible leaders avoid things they dislike.11. Some responsible leaders do things they dislike doing.Answer Options: For each conclusion, YES (Conclusion follows) or NO (Conclusion does not follow).Step-by-Step Solution:Interpret premises: Premise 1 equates to "All responsible leaders make difficult decisions" (negation of avoidance). Premise 2 indicates a subset of responsible leaders experiences dislike for these decisions.For Conclusion 9: The "some" leaders' dislike maps directly to difficult decisions being distasteful (synonymous) to that subset—inescapable from the overlap.For Conclusion 10: Premises address only responsible leaders; irresponsible ones are unmentioned, permitting scenarios where they confront dislikes (no logical bridge).For Conclusion 11: Premise 1 mandates action despite Premise 2's dislike for some—thus, those some perform disliked tasks necessarily. Correct Answers: 9. YES; 10. NO; 11. YES.Explanation: This item probes relational deductions, where candidates falter by extrapolating to undefined groups (e.g., Conclusion 10) or conflating "dislike" with avoidance. The YES for 9 and 11 hinges on the premises' intersection: universal obligation meets partial aversion, yielding compelled action amid distaste. NO for 10 enforces textual fidelity, deduction prohibits invention. In practice, this parallels deducing liability from contractual duties and partial breaches, where extraneous assumptions (e.g., on non-parties) derail claims. For proficiency, diagram premises as sets (responsible leaders → decisions; subset dislikes) and apply the Counterexample Test rigorously. Engage with the full PDF exercises, analyzing why "some" amplifies rather than dilutes necessity.Proficiency in Deduction fortifies logical chains; advance to the next category: Interpretation, evaluating whether evidence sustains conclusions beyond reasonable doubt.4. Interpretation: Weighing Evidence to Determine if a Conclusion is Warranted Beyond Reasonable DoubtThe Interpretation section of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal requires candidates to evaluate whether a proposed conclusion is justified by the evidence in a short passage, to the standard of "beyond reasonable doubt." This differs from Deduction's absolute certainty, as Interpretation permits a probabilistic threshold: the conclusion must align closely with the passage's facts, principles, or data, without significant gaps or alternative explanations. In professional applications, such as legal evidence assessment or policy analysis, this skill ensures conclusions are defensible, avoiding overgeneralization from incomplete records.Core principles to apply:Conclusion Follows: The passage's evidence overwhelmingly supports the conclusion, leaving minimal room for doubt; it must be a logical extension without introducing unsupported elements.Conclusion Does Not Follow: The evidence is ambiguous, contradictory, or insufficient; common fallacies include assuming causation from correlation, overextending quantifiers (e.g., "all" from "some"), or injecting unstated reasons.A recommended approach is the "Evidence Balance Test": Catalog supporting and opposing elements from the passage, then assess if support predominates convincingly. Watch for four key fallacies: Reason (unproven cause), Indefinite Pronoun (misapplying "all/none"), Correlation-Causation (link without proof), and Jumping to Conclusions (extraneous info). This section includes 6 questions; dedicate 1-2 minutes each, prioritizing textual fidelity over intuition.Example Question (Drawn from Official Practice Materials):Passage: A study showed vocabulary size increases from zero words at eight months to 2,562 words at six years old.Proposed Conclusion: None of the children in this study had learned to talk by the age of six months.Answer Options: Conclusion Follows, Conclusion Does Not Follow.Step-by-Step Solution:Analyze the passage: It details a progressive increase starting from zero words at eight months, implying no prior vocabulary development.Map to the conclusion: "Learned to talk" equates to acquiring words; zero at eight months (pre-six months) directly precludes any earlier learning.Apply the Evidence Balance Test: Full support with no counter-evidence or ambiguity, the trajectory is unidirectional from zero. Correct Answer: Conclusion Follows.This example highlights straightforward evidential alignment; errors arise from assuming "talking" requires more than words, which the passage does not specify.Detailed Explanation of a Real Examination-Style Question:The following item, sourced from comprehensive preparation resources mirroring official assessments, illustrates a classic Reason Fallacy.Passage: I have a nine-month-old baby at home who typically cooperates when it's time to go to bed and falls asleep quickly. However, whenever her grandparents come over in the evening, she becomes upset when I try to put her to bed and continues to cry for an hour.Proposed Conclusion: My baby’s difficulty is mostly physiological, her grandparents give her chocolates to eat and the sugar makes her hyperactive.Answer Options: Conclusion Follows, Conclusion Does Not Follow.Step-by-Step Solution:Break down the passage: Routine bedtime compliance contrasts with disruption during grandparent visits, centered on emotional upset (crying).Evaluate the conclusion: It posits a specific physiological cause (sugar from chocolates) not mentioned in the passage, relying on external speculation rather than evidential support.Conduct the Evidence Balance Test: The passage notes behavioral change tied to presence, not diet; no data on chocolates or hyperactivity exists, introducing unproven causation. This embodies the Reason Fallacy, where an individual rationale substitutes for textual proof, failing the "beyond reasonable doubt" threshold. Correct Answer: Conclusion Does Not Follow.Explanation: Drawn from JobTestPrep's verified practice aligned with Watson-Glaser standards, this question exposes the peril of causal invention, candidates often select "Follows" from personal anecdote, but strict adherence reveals the evidential void. In a test setting, the passage's focus on timing (evenings with grandparents) suggests alternatives like excitement or routine disruption, underscoring why the conclusion lacks warrant. This parallels interpreting witness statements in trials, where ungrounded theories (e.g., "stress caused the inconsistency") must yield to facts alone. For deeper practice, consult our test platform, dissecting why indefinite extensions (e.g., "always") tip toward "Does Not Follow."Command of Interpretation refines evidential judgment; the final category awaits: Evaluation of Arguments, appraising persuasive strength.5. Evaluation of Arguments: Assessing the Strength of Support or OppositionThe Evaluation of Arguments section of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal challenges candidates to judge the persuasive merit of statements advanced in favor of or against a given proposition. This requires discerning relevance and cogency: arguments must directly address the issue and provide substantial, evidence-based weight, rather than tangential, emotive, or superficial commentary. In professional domains, such as legal advocacy or strategic advising, this skill is indispensable for constructing compelling briefs or rebutting opposing counsel, ensuring only robust content bolsters one's position.Fundamental principles to guide assessment:Strong Argument: The argument is directly pertinent to the proposition, offering significant evidential or logical support that materially advances the case (e.g., backed by data, principles, or clear causal links). It withstands scrutiny without reliance on assumptions or generalizations.Weak Argument: The argument is irrelevant (off-topic), insignificant (lacks impact), or flawed (e.g., anecdotal, circular, or ad hominem). Even relevant points falter if they provide minimal sway or introduce unproven elements.Adopt the "Relevance-Impact Framework": First, verify direct alignment with the proposition; second, gauge the argument's capacity to influence a reasonable evaluator (e.g., on a scale of substantial vs. negligible). Dismiss appeals to emotion or authority unless substantiated. This section often presents 10-12 items, each with 4-5 arguments; limit to 1 minute per argument, flagging irrelevance quickly to conserve time.Example Question:Proposition: Should company policy require all employees to take a one-hour lunch break?Argument: Yes; taking a lunch break would allow employees to recharge, leading to increased productivity in the afternoon.Answer Options: Strong Argument, Weak Argument.Step-by-Step Solution:Confirm relevance: The argument addresses productivity, a core benefit of breaks, tying directly to policy rationale (employee welfare and output).Evaluate impact: It posits a causal link (recharge → productivity) grounded in general psychological principles of rest, providing meaningful support without overreach.Framework application: Pertinent and persuasive, substantial enough to sway policy decisions. Correct Answer: Strong Argument.This exemplifies a balanced, principle-based argument; common misjudgments classify it as weak due to lacking empirical data, but general plausibility suffices here.Detailed Explanation of a Real Examination-Style Question:Consider this authentic example from verified preparation resources, reflecting the evaluative depth in recruitment tests.Proposition: Should the government increase funding for public libraries?Argument: Yes; a recent study of 500 urban residents found that 65% reported improved literacy skills after regular library visits, correlating with higher employment rates.Answer Options: Strong Argument, Weak Argument.Step-by-Step Solution:Assess relevance: The argument targets literacy and employment—key societal outcomes enhanced by libraries—aligning precisely with funding justification (public benefit).Measure impact: Empirical evidence (study sample, 65% correlation) delivers quantifiable weight, implying broad economic returns; the causal implication is reasonable without speculation.Apply the Framework: Directly on-point with high evidential heft, materially bolstering the "yes" case beyond mere opinion. No flaws like irrelevance or insignificance detract. Correct Answer: Strong Argument.Explanation: This question tests data-driven evaluation—a frequent stumbling block where candidates deem it weak for "correlation not causation." Yet, the argument's strength lies in its substantive contribution: the study's scale and outcomes provide persuasive leverage for policy advocacy, mirroring how statistical arguments fortify public interest litigation. In timed scenarios, haste leads to overlooking relevance; practice emphasizes scanning for "direct address" first. For further honing, check here, where weak examples (e.g., "Libraries are nice places") contrast by lacking evidential punch.ConclusionThe Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test is a key tool used by law firms to check if you can think clearly and logically, like spotting flaws in arguments or drawing smart conclusions from facts, it's not about law knowledge but skills for real jobs like reviewing contracts or advising clients. It has five parts: Inference, where you judge if a conclusion is true, probably true, or just not enough info based on a statement (like saying "probably true" if facts strongly hint someone is home from lights and noise); Recognition of Assumptions, spotting hidden ideas a statement relies on without saying them (like assuming a route is dangerous because of a river); Deduction, seeing if a conclusion must follow from rules (like "some rainy holidays are boring" if all rainy days are boring); Interpretation, checking if evidence backs a conclusion solidly (like no kids talked by six months if vocab starts at eight); and Evaluation of Arguments, rating if a point strongly supports or weakly misses an idea (like a study proving libraries boost jobs making a strong case for more funding). To ace it, stick to the text only, practice mocks timed at 40 questions in 50 minutes for free here, review mistakes by category, and use tricks like testing negatives or counterexamples, master this, and you'll shine in interviews at places like Clifford Chance, turning test smarts into career wins.

Introducing Law Gig: A detailed Guide to Creating or Performing Legal Tasks on Thrive
Latest

Introducing Law Gig: A detailed Guide to Creating or Performing Legal Tasks on Thrive

TR Thrive’s Law Gig platform makes legal work easier for everybody. If you’re a lawyer, you can find simple or complex jobs to do and get paid without stress. If you’re any person or business owner, you can quickly find someone to help you with things like contracts, litigation, registration, or legal advice, no long queues, no confusion. It’s a clean, fast way to connect people who need legal help with people who can provide it. There are over one thousand lawyers on Thrive, making it the largest legal marketplace in Nigeria and the best place to get favourable price options and high-quality service from freelance lawyers.This guide explains everything you need to know about using TR Thrive’s Law Gig platform from start to finish. It breaks down how anybody in need of legal service (e.g a business owner) can post a legal task, how lawyers can apply for the task, how payments are safely kept in escrow until the job is completed, and how both sides can chat, upload documents, and track progress. You’ll understand how to check a lawyer’s profile, how to choose the right person, how deadlines work, how to approve or reject completed work, and what to do if there is any disagreement. The goal is simple: to help you use the platform with full confidence, whether you are hiring a lawyer or looking for legal jobs to earn money (whether you work full-time or not).Who Can Use TR Thrive Law GigsTR Thrive Law Gigs is for everyone who needs legal help or wants to offer it. If you are a business owner, you can hire lawyers to handle company registration, contracts, trademarks, compliance, or urgent corporate tasks. If you are an individual, you can use it for family law matters, employment issues, property agreements, immigration support, or any legal advice you need. Even lawyers themselves can use it, either to find urgent help from other lawyers, share briefs, or outsource research and document reviews. Once you post a gig, many qualified lawyers can show interest in doing the job, and you can review their profiles, negotiate prices, and choose the best fit. The platform makes it easy to handle both simple and complex tasks safely, quickly, and flexibly, giving you options whether the job is small, urgent, or requires special expertise.How to Post a Law Gig on TR ThrivePosting a law gig is your first step if you need legal help. Start by going to Post a Gig. The platform makes it simple, but taking a little time to explain your task properly will save you headaches later.When posting, you will fill out these key parts:a. Gig Title – A short, clear name for your task. Examples:“CAC Business Name Registration Needed”“Employment Contract Review”b. Description – This is where you tell the lawyer exactly what you need. Include:The purpose of the taskAll important details (documents, deadlines, special instructions). Don't ever post any sensitive information!What you expect as the final outcomec. Category & Location – Choose the type of legal work (Contract Drafting, Litigation Support, IP, Immigration, etc.) and indicate if it is Remote or in a specific city.d. Budget – Start from ₦3,000 and adjust based on the task’s complexity. A fair budget attracts serious professionals.g. Requirements & Upload – If the task needs specific skills or documents, you can upload them directly.h. Advertise (Optional): If your order is very urgent and you want us to advertise to all Thrive lawyers, then you can pay ₦1,000. If you don't do this now, the price increases to ₦5,000 after the order goes live. After submitting, your gig goes live at All Orders. Lawyers can then review your details, ask questions through chat, and apply. Clear instructions make it easier to get qualified lawyers quickly and reduce mistakes. Also ensure to comply with Posting Terms to prevent your orders from being removed by the platform.How Lawyers Can Apply and Take Law GigsOnce a gig is live, lawyers and legal professionals can browse it and apply. To see available gigs, go to Orders Page. Each gig shows the task details, budget, and deadline.When you find a gig you can handle, click “Show Interest”. You can add a short note to the client explaining why you are the right person. For example:“I am a Lagos-based lawyer with 5 years of experience in CAC registrations. I can complete this task in 3 days and send all documents in PDF.”After you apply, the client can review your profile, see your past completed jobs, ratings, and decide whom to allocate the task to, get price suggestions, edit your price, reallocate, and relevant stuff on the Order Details page of each order.. Once allocated, the payment is held safely in escrow, and you can start chatting and sharing documents with the client through the chat option on the order details page.This process protects both sides: the lawyer knows the payment is secured, and the client knows the work will be done before the money is released. It also makes communication easier and avoids misunderstandings.How to Allocate an Order and Understand Payment StatusTo allocate an order, first review interested professionals on your order details page, then select the one you want to work with. Payment must be completed before allocation, you can pay via Paystack (card, bank transfer, or USSD), use your TR Thrive wallet balance, or generate a shareable payment link for someone else to pay. Once payment is processed, the full order amount is immediately held in escrow and appears in the professional's wallet as "pending balance" (held funds). The order status changes to "allocated," and both parties can start communicating through the order chat system. The funds remain in escrow (pending/held status) until the professional completes the work and you verify it. Upon your approval, the payment is released: a 3% platform fee is deducted, and the net amount moves from "pending balance" to "available balance" in the professional's wallet, ready for withdrawal. If you cancel the order before work starts, the funds are returned to your original payment method or wallet. If a dispute arises or the order is discontinued, the escrow system protects both parties, funds stay held until resolution, then are either released to the professional upon successful completion or refunded to you if the order is cancelled or the work is rejected. This escrow system ensures secure transactions where payment is guaranteed for completed work and refundable if the order doesn't proceed.Understanding 'Thrive and Friends' Payment LinksThrive and Friends payment links let order creators share payment with anyone. If you're a business owner, you can send the link to a colleague, assistant, or finance team to pay for an order allocation. If you're an individual, you can share it with a sponsor, family member, or friend who wants to cover the cost (maybe as a Christmas gift 😀). Law firms can use it to delegate payments to partners or accounting staff. Organisations can share it with authorised personnel for approval and payment. Once you generate a link, anyone with it can pay securely via Paystack, and the order is automatically allocated to the selected professional. The link expires after a set period for security, and you can revoke it anytime if plans change. This feature makes it easy to handle payments when you're not available, need approval from others, or want someone else to cover the cost, while keeping full control over the allocation process.Understanding Crowdfunding for Legal FeesWe're introducing the first-ever crowdfunding feature for legal fees and professional services on TR Thrive. Crowdfunding lets order creators invite multiple people to contribute any amount toward covering their legal fees or professional service costs. To get started, go to the order allocation page, click the "Crowdfund this order" section, and generate a unique crowdfunding link. Once generated, copy and share the link with family, friends, colleagues, community members, or well-wishers who want to help. Law firms can use it to pool resources from partners or clients for complex cases. Organisations can rally team members or stakeholders to collectively fund important legal services. Individuals can share it on social media, in community groups, or with their network to gather support. Contributors can choose any amount they're comfortable with (from ₦100 upwards), add encouraging messages, and even contribute anonymously if they prefer privacy. The platform tracks progress in real time, showing how much has been raised and how much is still needed. Once the goal is reached, the order is automatically allocated to the selected professional, and all contributors can see the impact of their collective support. This feature makes legal services more accessible by allowing communities to come together and help each other, whether it's for a personal legal matter, a community cause, or supporting someone in need. You maintain full control, you can revoke the link anytime, and it expires after 30 days for security. Crowdfunding on TR Thrive transforms how legal fees are paid, making justice and professional services more accessible through the power of community support.How Escrow Protects You and the LawyerTR Thrive uses an escrow system to make sure payments are safe for both clients and lawyers. When a client posts a gig and allocates it to a lawyer, the money is held securely until the task is completed. This means the lawyer knows the client cannot cancel and run away with the work, and the client knows the lawyer cannot take the money without finishing the job.Here’s how it works:Client posts and allocates the gig, payment goes into escrow.Lawyer completes the work and submits proof.Client reviews the work and either approves or requests revisions.Once approved, the money is released to the lawyer’s wallet, minus the 3% platform fee.For any disputes, both sides can file a complaint by clicking the dispute order page on every Order Details page. Neutral admins review the evidence and ensure a fair decision. This system builds trust and makes sure everyone plays fair.How Clients/Order Creators Can Manage Their GigsAfter posting a gig, clients can easily manage it from their dashboard at the My Orders Page. The dashboard shows all your gigs, including active, allocated, and completed jobs. You can check which lawyers have applied, view their profiles, and communicate through chat on the order details page which is accessible by just viewing the order.Clients can also:Edit unallocated gigs – update description, budget, or deadline before choosing a lawyer.Reallocate tasks – if the first lawyer cannot complete the job, you can pick another applicant.Cancel gigs – unallocated gigs can be deleted, and the money is refunded if it was already in escrow.Track progress – see updates, file uploads, and delivery notes in one place.Using the dashboard properly saves time, prevents confusion, and ensures that tasks are completed on schedule. It also allows clients to keep all communication and files in one secure place.How Lawyers/Order Performers Can Manage Their JobsLawyers can manage their gigs from My Orders Page, which shows all jobs you have applied for, been allocated, or completed. Once a gig is allocated to you, the chat option can be accessed on Order Details page, where you can ask questions, share documents, and clarify details with the client.Key steps for lawyers to stay on top of tasks:Check deadlines – make sure you deliver work on time to keep a good rating.Submit proof – upload completed work or documents for client review.Communicate clearly – respond quickly to client messages; clear communication reduces disputes.Track earnings – see pending and available payments in your wallet here.By following these steps, lawyers can build trust with clients, maintain high ratings, and get paid safely and quickly.How to Complete or Mark Orders as DoneAfter finishing the work, go to the order details page and click "Mark as Completed" on the Order Details page.. On the completion page, upload proof files (documents, images, PDFs, Word, Excel, or ZIP files up to 5MB) that show the work is done. You can also add notes summarizing what was delivered, key points, or instructions for the client. Once you submit, the order status changes to "Pending Review" and the creator is notified via email and in-platform notification. The payment remains in escrow until the creator verifies your submission. If approved, the payment is released to your wallet (minus a 3% platform fee), and the order status changes to "Completed". If rejected, you'll receive feedback and can update your submission with new files or notes. You can also use the order chat system to communicate with the client and request revisions before final submission. This process ensures quality work is verified before payment is released, protecting both you and the client.How to Withdraw from Wallet After Completion is ApprovedAfter the order creator approves your completion, the payment is automatically released from escrow to your "available balance" in your wallet, go to Withdraw Funds and enter your bank details: bank name, account number (10 digits), and account name (must match your bank records). Enter the withdrawal amount (minimum ₦5,000, maximum your available balance). You can optionally save your bank account for future withdrawals. Click "Request Withdrawal" to submit. The system deducts the amount from your available balance and holds it until administrators process your request (usually within 1-3 business days). You'll receive email confirmation, and the funds will be transferred to your bank account once processed. You can track all withdrawal requests and transaction history in your wallet dashboard.Tips to Get the Best Lawyers or Land More JobsUsing TR Thrive effectively is about more than just posting or applying for gigs, it’s about doing it smart.For Clients:Write clear, detailed gig descriptions so lawyers understand exactly what you need.Set a fair budget, too low may scare away experienced lawyers.Respond quickly to messages to avoid delays.Use the advertising option to promote urgent gigs and attract more professionals.For Lawyers:Apply on your profile page here to get verified as a lawyer on Thrive. Order creators would see whether you are verified or not, and being a verified lawyer would boost your credibility. You would need to provide your enrollment number and your call to bar certificate. Write strong interest notes when applying, explain why you are the right fit.Keep chat polite and professional; prompt replies build trust.Deliver high-quality work and upload proof to get good ratings.Following these tips increases chances of success, whether you are hiring a lawyer or earning from gigs.What to Do if There’s a ProblemSometimes gigs don’t go smoothly, but TR Thrive has ways to handle issues. If you are a client and the work is late, incomplete, or unclear, you can request revisions through verify order button. If that doesn’t solve the problem, you can file a dispute by clicking the dispute order button, and provide all relevant information with any supporting documents.Lawyers can also file disputes if clients try to release payment unfairly or give unclear instructions. The platform’s admins act as neutral referees to make sure both sides are treated fairly.Other helpful steps:Keep chat messages and file uploads organised, they serve as proof if there’s a disagreement.Read the platform’s terms to understand rules about deadlines, payments, and cancellations.Contact support quickly if you feel stuck or unsure about any process.Knowing these steps ensures that gigs stay safe, professional, and stress-free for everyone involved.Start Thriving on TR Thrive TodayTR Thrive’s Law Gig platform makes legal work simple and fair for everyone. Clients save time and money by connecting quickly with qualified lawyers, while lawyers earn extra income by taking on tasks they can handle from anywhere. With escrow protection, built-in chat, document uploads, and clear dispute processes, the platform keeps everything safe and organised.Over a thousand lawyers are already using TR Thrive to simplify legal work, whether it’s small business registration, contract reviews, or litigation support.Why wait? Sign up today and experience a faster, smarter, and safer way to handle legal tasks, one gig at a time.

View All Articles

Latest Gigs

View All
Gig

Property Document Recovery

This is a gig to recover a client’s property document. I’m looking for a qualified lawyer based in Ibadan to assist with reclaiming an important property document currently held by a commercial bank in the city. The document has been with the bank for several years in relation to an outstanding facility, and my client is now ready to clear the remaining balance and regularise the entire matter.The lawyer will be required to communicate with the bank, verify the status of the facility, review the supporting evidence already available, and take the necessary steps to ensure the release of the property document once all obligations are resolved. The goal is to complete this process efficiently, lawfully, and with full documentation of every step taken. We will also be providing the remaining debt owed to the bank, which is less than a million naira.

₦200,000.00
Oyo
Gig

Legal Marketing Intern (Contract – 1 Month)

Okay, so this is a gig and not a job. We are looking for someone to work as a foot soldier for a month, a proactive Legal Marketer Intern to support our digital operations, community engagement, and platform management. This gig is ideal for a law graduate or young lawyer who is active within the legal community and plugged into multiple lawyers’ or law students’ WhatsApp groups. The ideal candidate is tech-savvy, reliable, and able to deliver consistently without excuses. It is designed for someone who can commit to light weekly hours while driving real impact.Key ResponsibilitiesShare platform updates, opportunities, and announcements across relevant lawyers’ and law students’ WhatsApp groups.Post regular content updates on the platform to maintain engagement and visibility.Support the management team with administrative and operational tasks as needed.Monitor user activities to ensure full compliance with platform rules and terms of use.Identify, report, and follow up on bugs, errors, or glitches within the platform.Assist in executing marketing campaigns targeted at the legal community.Track engagement metrics and provide periodic feedback for platform improvement.  

₦50,000.00
Remote
View All Gigs

Place your ads here

Advertisement space — your content will appear when loaded

Advertise with us

Featured Events

View All

Taxation Basics for Legal Practitioners

Training

An introductory NBA-ICLE CPD-accredited programme on taxation for lawyers. Faculty will explain key ...

Remote Mar 10, 2026
View Details

Capital Markets and Securities Regulation for Corporate Lawyers

Training

An NBA-ICLE CPD-accredited training that introduces lawyers to capital markets and securities regula...

Remote Mar 06, 2026
View Details

Arbitration Nuts and Bolts Series – Part 1 From Clause to Commencement

Seminar

Many arbitration disputes become more complicated than they need to be because of decisions made at ...

Other Mar 06, 2026
View Details

Data Protection and Privacy Compliance Masterclass

Training

A CPD-accredited NBA-ICLE masterclass on data protection and privacy compliance. The programme cover...

Remote Mar 08, 2026
View Details

Notaries Public and Documentation Practice

Training

NBA-ICLE offers this CPD-accredited training on Notaries Public and documentation practice. Particip...

Remote Mar 12, 2026
View Details

Structuring for success: A step-by-step guide to building a Cross-Border Trade Law Practice

Training

WEBINAR ALERT ‼️ The global economy doesn't stop at borders — and neither should your practi...

Remote Mar 05, 2026
View Details

The Practical Aspects of Award Writing; Content and Form

Training

The core of any Arbitration Proceeding is a well written Award. A well-written arbitral award is...

Remote Mar 12, 2026
View Details

The Practice of Law in a Digital Economy

Training

A CPD-accredited NBA-ICLE session on the realities of practising law in a digital economy. It explor...

Remote Mar 13, 2026
View Details
See More Events

Place your ads here

Advertisement space — your content will appear when loaded

Advertise with us